“Foxcatcher” – some thoughts

Watched Foxcatcher yesterday as part of a “catch-up-on-Netflix” double-header.

Foxcatcher_First_Teaser_Poster

I don’t want to do a full-on review here, just share a couple thoughts…

It is hard to get past Steve Carell playing a serious role. Even with the Oscar-approved, Nicole-Kidman prosthetic nose, it took awhile to finally stop thinking “Steve sure looks silly with that nose on” every time he came on the screen.

But I finally did, so that says something about his performance.

Creepy. As. Hell.

Mark Ruffalo was solid (as expected) as Dave Shultz. Is there a role he can’t play?

Channing Tatum was, well… Channing Tatum as Mark Shultz.

All that aside, the movie was okay.

That’s it. Just okay. It was a slow burn, which is fine, but even when we reach the inevitable ending of this story, it just… ends.

Despite being based on true events, the film feels more like some sort of incredibly well-thought-out back-story for the characters of some other movie that was to follow.

I won’t tell you not to watch it, because Carell and Ruffalo’s performances are worth that, but don’t feel like you need to rush to do so. It will still be there.

Advertisements

One thought on ““Foxcatcher” – some thoughts

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s